Today April 25th the USA has sent George Mitchell Obama's point man on Israel to Israel yet once again.
For the past year we have scene Barak try his best to start and bring back the peace process in the failing
Israeli Palestinian conflict. Even Vice -President Biden went to Israel. I am not going to comment on the process or what the outcome might be since I hoping for the best during these meetings.
I will tell you this the whole Middle East Peace process. You have to look at the Countries involved. You have to look at the double headed snake in the room. Syria and Iran. If you cut off the heads you will find that peace will be an objective. If you do not it will be hard to see. Forget about religion is the Countries governments that are fucking you.
All the Best,
SJOK
Here are some thoughts from an Israeli officer......
Israel must prepare the international diplomatic community for a war of this kind and will have to make it clear from the beginning that we have no alternative. Israel will be tasked with explaining that, because the enemy is protecting terrorists during a time of war, we have no choice but to hit the enemy's home front and infrastructure. The very fact of an international debate on this issue is liable to deter the Syrians on the one hand, though it might also put Israel under international diplomatic pressure to restrain itself on the other - but that is a risk worth taking.
Above all, Israel must make it clear right now that, in the event of a missile attack from the north, it will act on the goal of immediately deposing the Alawite regime in Syria even before turning its attention to the missile threat. Such a statement could deter the Syrians from arming Hezbollah with Scuds, out of concern that the Muslim organization might fire the missiles without first coordinating with Syria.
The writer is a reserve brigadier general and former head of the IDF artillery corps
twitter: SirJkennedy
Sunday, April 25, 2010
Friday, April 23, 2010
Iran steps to the front of the Media...by Sir Jeremiah Kennedy
If you read my blog sorry about the tormenting life. For the past 8 years my goal has been to
denuclearization of North Korea and Iran, I have basically attended each meeting with the higher ups. aka envoys. This story pretty much sums up were we are today regarding Iran and its quest for the bomb.
the following is an article written by Gary thomas of Voice of America............
The dispute between the West and Iran over Tehran's nuclear ambitions has now dragged on for nearly eight years. Even as Iran holds new military exercises in the Persian Gulf, the United States continues to push for new sanctions on Iran in the U.N. Security Council. There is no resolution in sight as the U.S. wrestles with how, or even if, Iran can be deterred from going down the nuclear path.
At a recent congressional hearing, Deputy Undersecretary of Defense for Policy Michelle Flournoy said the Obama administration is ruling nothing out, including possible military action, in its bid to deter Iran from becoming a nuclear-armed state.
"As the president said, all options are on the table," said Michelle Flournoy. "We see it as the Department of Defense's responsibility to plan for all contingencies and provide the president with a wide range of military options should they become necessary. But as both the secretary - [Defense] Secretary Gates - and [Joint Chiefs of Staff] Chairman [Mike] Mullen have stated, military options are not preferable. And we continue to believe that the most effective approach at this point in time is a combination of diplomacy and pressure in terms of how best to change Iranian behavior."
But analysts say that changing Iranian behavior is easier said than done, and that there may be nothing the U.S. and its allies can do if Iran is determined to become a nuclear power.
Iran denies harboring any nuclear arms ambitions. But on-again, off-again negotiations between Tehran and Western powers have yielded little, and Iran's positions shift frequently, often depending on who is voicing them.
Mark Fitzpatrick, director of the Non-Proliferation and Disarmament Program at London's International Institute for Strategic Studies, says the U.S. and Iran are headed toward the kind of impasse that characterized the relationship between the United States and the Soviet Union.
"I think we are in for a long Cold War with Iran in which it will continue to make some progress," said Mark Fitzpatrick. "It will continue to face technical difficulties in its program. It won't actually cross the line to producing a nuclear weapon because it will face debilitating military action if it does. And sanctions will be applied that will hamper the Iranian economy but won't necessarily bring it to its knees."
Echoing some other analysts, Fitzpatrick says the West may have to accept an Iran that is nuclear-capable but not nuclear-armed - that is, it can build atomic bombs but halts just short of actually producing them.
"We may have to live with a nuclear-capable Iran," he said. "I think Iran can be deterred from crossing the line from capability to production. And I think they know that if they cross the line, if they start producing nuclear weapons, if they were to test any or expel inspectors or in any other way signal that they were going for the bomb, then I think they know that they are very likely going to face a military attack."
Tate Nurkin, a security and military intelligence analyst at IHS Jane's Publications, says military action would not halt the Iranian program anyway, and that it would probably spark a wider conflict.
"You can delay it [the program] for several months," said Tate Nurkin. "But I think the problem with that is that it sets off an almost certain conflict in the region, the results of which are highly unpredictable. And the likelihood of that sort of conflict intensifying and for really fundamental miscalculation that would lead from a regional conflict to something that could get larger is pretty high."
There may also be attempts to internally sabotage the Iranian program, but such covert action is never discussed publicly by officials.
Israel remains extremely nervous about Iran, especially about President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad's repeated comments about wiping Israel off the map and his denial of the Holocaust. If there were to be an attack on Iranian nuclear sites, it might well be Israel that launches them, although the distances involved and unfriendly airspace present tactical difficulties for such a move.
Sanctions, says Mark Fitzpatrick, are not likely to sway Iran from the nuclear path. But, he adds, they do serve several auxiliary purposes.
Among them, sanctions show that Iran's taking a hard line is not without at least some cost, showing, in effect, as he puts it, that crime doesn't pay.
They can also limit Iran's strategic programs by cutting off access to equipment they need, forcing them to manufacture components themselves that may not be of as high a quality as the imports. For example, it is making parts for centrifuges for uranium enrichment, and those centrifuges are reporting to be breaking down at a higher than normal rate. And sanctions, he says, also have the side effect of showing the viability of the U.N. Security Council.
denuclearization of North Korea and Iran, I have basically attended each meeting with the higher ups. aka envoys. This story pretty much sums up were we are today regarding Iran and its quest for the bomb.
the following is an article written by Gary thomas of Voice of America............
The dispute between the West and Iran over Tehran's nuclear ambitions has now dragged on for nearly eight years. Even as Iran holds new military exercises in the Persian Gulf, the United States continues to push for new sanctions on Iran in the U.N. Security Council. There is no resolution in sight as the U.S. wrestles with how, or even if, Iran can be deterred from going down the nuclear path.
At a recent congressional hearing, Deputy Undersecretary of Defense for Policy Michelle Flournoy said the Obama administration is ruling nothing out, including possible military action, in its bid to deter Iran from becoming a nuclear-armed state.
"As the president said, all options are on the table," said Michelle Flournoy. "We see it as the Department of Defense's responsibility to plan for all contingencies and provide the president with a wide range of military options should they become necessary. But as both the secretary - [Defense] Secretary Gates - and [Joint Chiefs of Staff] Chairman [Mike] Mullen have stated, military options are not preferable. And we continue to believe that the most effective approach at this point in time is a combination of diplomacy and pressure in terms of how best to change Iranian behavior."
But analysts say that changing Iranian behavior is easier said than done, and that there may be nothing the U.S. and its allies can do if Iran is determined to become a nuclear power.
Iran denies harboring any nuclear arms ambitions. But on-again, off-again negotiations between Tehran and Western powers have yielded little, and Iran's positions shift frequently, often depending on who is voicing them.
Mark Fitzpatrick, director of the Non-Proliferation and Disarmament Program at London's International Institute for Strategic Studies, says the U.S. and Iran are headed toward the kind of impasse that characterized the relationship between the United States and the Soviet Union.
"I think we are in for a long Cold War with Iran in which it will continue to make some progress," said Mark Fitzpatrick. "It will continue to face technical difficulties in its program. It won't actually cross the line to producing a nuclear weapon because it will face debilitating military action if it does. And sanctions will be applied that will hamper the Iranian economy but won't necessarily bring it to its knees."
Echoing some other analysts, Fitzpatrick says the West may have to accept an Iran that is nuclear-capable but not nuclear-armed - that is, it can build atomic bombs but halts just short of actually producing them.
"We may have to live with a nuclear-capable Iran," he said. "I think Iran can be deterred from crossing the line from capability to production. And I think they know that if they cross the line, if they start producing nuclear weapons, if they were to test any or expel inspectors or in any other way signal that they were going for the bomb, then I think they know that they are very likely going to face a military attack."
Tate Nurkin, a security and military intelligence analyst at IHS Jane's Publications, says military action would not halt the Iranian program anyway, and that it would probably spark a wider conflict.
"You can delay it [the program] for several months," said Tate Nurkin. "But I think the problem with that is that it sets off an almost certain conflict in the region, the results of which are highly unpredictable. And the likelihood of that sort of conflict intensifying and for really fundamental miscalculation that would lead from a regional conflict to something that could get larger is pretty high."
There may also be attempts to internally sabotage the Iranian program, but such covert action is never discussed publicly by officials.
Israel remains extremely nervous about Iran, especially about President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad's repeated comments about wiping Israel off the map and his denial of the Holocaust. If there were to be an attack on Iranian nuclear sites, it might well be Israel that launches them, although the distances involved and unfriendly airspace present tactical difficulties for such a move.
Sanctions, says Mark Fitzpatrick, are not likely to sway Iran from the nuclear path. But, he adds, they do serve several auxiliary purposes.
Among them, sanctions show that Iran's taking a hard line is not without at least some cost, showing, in effect, as he puts it, that crime doesn't pay.
They can also limit Iran's strategic programs by cutting off access to equipment they need, forcing them to manufacture components themselves that may not be of as high a quality as the imports. For example, it is making parts for centrifuges for uranium enrichment, and those centrifuges are reporting to be breaking down at a higher than normal rate. And sanctions, he says, also have the side effect of showing the viability of the U.N. Security Council.
Saturday, April 3, 2010
The Washington conference on Nuclear Stability by Sir Jeremiah
Boy O' Boy this just getting better. Now after the Quartet and the Perm 5 members of the security council discuss Iran sanctions. Now we have a conference. Anyway I will not be attending. The topic of discussion is containing and distruputing nuclear power without one actually going off. That would be Bad.
I am glad to hear China is finally coming around with concerns to Iran.....as noted in article......
Chinese Foreign Ministry spokesman Qin Gang said Thursday in Beijing that Hu would stop in Washington on his way to visit Brazil.
"The nuclear security summit will mainly discuss the threat posed by nuclear terrorism," Qin said. He was cautious when pressed on Beijing's Iran policy, saying only that "China will continue to endeavor toward a peaceful resolution."
Yin Gang, a Middle East expert at the Chinese Academy of Social Sciences, said Chinese officials were expected to press Iran's visiting envoy on its nuclear ambitions.
"If Iran continues with its nuclear program in this manner, they should not expect China to acquiesce," Yin said.
Any way
Ta ta
Happy Easter
ill be at the Ritz Carlton, Fort Laud
I am glad to hear China is finally coming around with concerns to Iran.....as noted in article......
Chinese Foreign Ministry spokesman Qin Gang said Thursday in Beijing that Hu would stop in Washington on his way to visit Brazil.
"The nuclear security summit will mainly discuss the threat posed by nuclear terrorism," Qin said. He was cautious when pressed on Beijing's Iran policy, saying only that "China will continue to endeavor toward a peaceful resolution."
Yin Gang, a Middle East expert at the Chinese Academy of Social Sciences, said Chinese officials were expected to press Iran's visiting envoy on its nuclear ambitions.
"If Iran continues with its nuclear program in this manner, they should not expect China to acquiesce," Yin said.
Any way
Ta ta
Happy Easter
ill be at the Ritz Carlton, Fort Laud
Wednesday, March 31, 2010
My day of pain
WASHINGTON – Six major world powers have agreed to begin putting together proposed new sanctions on Iran over its suspect nuclear program after China dropped its opposition, U.S. officials said Wednesday.
China, long a holdout against fresh international penalties against Iran, signaled its willingness Wednesday to consider a U.N. Security Council sanctions resolution, two U.S. government officials said.
That would appear to improve prospects for passing a resolution aimed at increasing economic and diplomatic pressure on Iran to scale back its nuclear ambitions, which Tehran insists are limited to developingnuclear power for peaceful purposes.
In another sign of movement on the Chinese front, Iran's state media reported Wednesday that the country's top nuclear negotiator will travel to Beijing to discuss possible U.N. sanctions. Iranian state television said Saeed Jalili will hold talks Thursday with senior Chinese officials "concerning the nuclear program."
President Barack Obama had said Tuesday he hoped to have Iran sanctions in place within weeks — a timetable that appeared highly ambitious given China's reluctance to even discuss specific sanctions.
a double untantra by sir sir jeremiah orion kennedy
I am at this point being drugged with lsd or some kind of cia nsa prhamastical drug, and demand now 80million dollars for the 15 years off torture. And if the kill be so be it, any way watching dave wathews.
My life by Sir Jeremiah orion Kennedy
At this moment I am being tortured by the USA. The voices have not spot for months. Now a little back story.
I was born in Dallas Texas in 1964. I was raised by agents. They my parents probably had no other choice put to raise me or they would be tortured like I am right now.
The night before 9/11 I had a dream that i was on the top story of the twin towers. The next morning the towers came down. I have been tortured since 1995. The War that we no, and the finacial metdown is all planed, all the homeless people all the pain was all planed. The United States of America is in now the hands of of a secreat ogranization. that has ultimate power. The killed all the hatians.
I was born in Dallas Texas in 1964. I was raised by agents. They my parents probably had no other choice put to raise me or they would be tortured like I am right now.
The night before 9/11 I had a dream that i was on the top story of the twin towers. The next morning the towers came down. I have been tortured since 1995. The War that we no, and the finacial metdown is all planed, all the homeless people all the pain was all planed. The United States of America is in now the hands of of a secreat ogranization. that has ultimate power. The killed all the hatians.
Friday, March 26, 2010
2nd Korean War might begin.....by Sir Jeremiah Orion Keinnedy
South Korea military ship sinks!!!!
South Korea (AP)—South Korea's military scrambled naval vessels to the western waters near the disputed maritime border with rival North Korea late Friday after an explosion ripped a hole in the bottom of a military ship, officials and news reports said.
The ship, on a routine patrolling mission with 104 crew members on board, began sinking off the coast of South Korean-controlled Baengnyeong Island close to North Korea around 9:45 p.m. (1245 GMT, 9:45 a.m. EDT), an official at the Joint Chiefs of Staff said, speaking on condition of anonymity in line with department policy.
South Korea's Yonhap news agency reported an explosion in the rear of the 1,200-ton ship and said the military had not ruled out the possibility of an attack by North Korea.
Maybe its just a small incident. Or will the North Korean's want war.
also.... Word that a South Korean naval ship sank in the tense waters around the disputed maritime border with communist North Korea set off panic: The president convened an emergency meeting and the military dispatched a fleet of ships.
In other news I was severly tortured yesterday and this morning just before Russia and USA sign Nuclear Pact.
All the Best,
SJOK
South Korea (AP)—South Korea's military scrambled naval vessels to the western waters near the disputed maritime border with rival North Korea late Friday after an explosion ripped a hole in the bottom of a military ship, officials and news reports said.
The ship, on a routine patrolling mission with 104 crew members on board, began sinking off the coast of South Korean-controlled Baengnyeong Island close to North Korea around 9:45 p.m. (1245 GMT, 9:45 a.m. EDT), an official at the Joint Chiefs of Staff said, speaking on condition of anonymity in line with department policy.
South Korea's Yonhap news agency reported an explosion in the rear of the 1,200-ton ship and said the military had not ruled out the possibility of an attack by North Korea.
Maybe its just a small incident. Or will the North Korean's want war.
also.... Word that a South Korean naval ship sank in the tense waters around the disputed maritime border with communist North Korea set off panic: The president convened an emergency meeting and the military dispatched a fleet of ships.
Five hours later, 58 sailors had been pulled to safety but some 40 others were missing, reports said. There was no indication early Saturday that North Korea was to blame for the ship's demise, but troops kept a vigilant watch.
Seoul's panic attack — hours after North Korea's military threatened "unpredictable strikes" against the U.S. and South Korea — highlighted the fragility of peace on the divided Korean peninsula.
The two Koreas remain locked in a state of war because their three-year conflict ended in a truce, not a peace treaty, in 1953.
In other news I was severly tortured yesterday and this morning just before Russia and USA sign Nuclear Pact.
All the Best,
SJOK
North Korea and my daily torture by SJOK
The following comes from a North Korea General....mind you that North Korea rhetoric is usually intense to say the least. I would also like to state that the torture I recieved last week was on March 19th - the day the "Quartet" met, that is the United Nations, Russia, US, and the European Union. The purpose of this group is to find peace in Israel. Yesterday torture may have to do with the Iran sanctions the US had to back away from hard ones, due to Russia and China refusal to go along. 10:52 am Obama gives speech that Nuclear Russia treaty is appoved.
Ta ta
T.
Here are the Generals statement on North Korea US relations:
The Stalinist nation's military command cited a South Korean newspaper report of last Friday as evidence of "desperate moves of the US imperialists and the South Korean puppet warmongers" for regime change.
"Those who seek to bring down the system in the DPRK (North Korea)... will fall victim to the unprecedented nuclear strikes of the invincible army," a General Staff spokesman told the official Korean Central News Agency (KCNA).
Describing the North's Communist system as an "impregnable fortress," the military pooh-poohed expectations of regime collapse as "a pipe dream of a lunatic wishing for the sky to fall." It said North's Army and people would bolster the nuclear deterrent "capable of frustrating any plot and provocation with a single strike."
Ta ta
T.
Here are the Generals statement on North Korea US relations:
The Stalinist nation's military command cited a South Korean newspaper report of last Friday as evidence of "desperate moves of the US imperialists and the South Korean puppet warmongers" for regime change.
"Those who seek to bring down the system in the DPRK (North Korea)... will fall victim to the unprecedented nuclear strikes of the invincible army," a General Staff spokesman told the official Korean Central News Agency (KCNA).
Describing the North's Communist system as an "impregnable fortress," the military pooh-poohed expectations of regime collapse as "a pipe dream of a lunatic wishing for the sky to fall." It said North's Army and people would bolster the nuclear deterrent "capable of frustrating any plot and provocation with a single strike."
Friday, March 19, 2010
The battle of evermore..led zepplin by SJOK
I will never forget the 2 i believe were to warhogs..flying a flyby..they did fly over my house when i was smoking a cigar so ..im just saying.
Nice.
SJOK
Nice.
SJOK
Thursday, March 18, 2010
Greed sometimes is not good Israel? by Sir Jeremiah Kennedy
To Israel and in particular Bebe and Zippi. I have hold my tongue up until know. You must give up this notion that you can achieve Peace
through the continuing building and the land you are going to give away. In the long term we all agree I thought that Israel would be the Gentlemen and return the land fought for in War.
<<<<<<<<< The following is reprinted from November 5th 2009 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
I will comment on the Middle East at another time. sjok
Now in all honesty you are becoming greedy, and in the time of peacemaking this is not a good sign. I did not want you to win the election Bebe and would have perferred that Livini won. Know I see why I should trust my gut feeling. Your term in office will end at sometime Bebe, and then maybe then we can have Israel see a different path in the peace process. I do understand the principle of your office stating you want to negiotate that at a later date and are ready for peace. Yet we here in the background of your new policies regarding countries or the PLO must except you as an Jewish state. You really need to pull back on your negiotiating skills a tad.
I here by state then any future expansion in the settlement areas to be illegal.
All the Best,
Sir Jeremiah Orion Kennedy.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)