The US Afgan policy by SJOK

Did Karazi win the election? No, he used his criminal connections including the CIA and rigged the polling stations. Remember and then the US came out and acknowledge his win. Not a few months before the USA
screamed when Iran elections did not go as planed. So his rigs the elections and breezes into office. Without another election or run off.

So where are we today? The US policy is to fight so we can establish an official Afganistan government. Basically allowing Karazi to stay in office. The real reason behind all the fighting is money. If the money comes from the CIA stealing the Opium so be it, or if the money comes from establishing a central government that all its people know pay taxes to. Welcoming Afgan to the IMF and other Worldy lending operations.

What ever the policy is at the moment our young men and women are dying. And at this time the US policy is not changing meaning many more will die in the months ahead. I believe the attack on Times Square and the Oil rig in the Gulf Coast were 2 terror attempts the week before Karazi arrived in DC. The non legitmate government in both Afganistan and Pakistan are corrupt. There are elements in both these countries that are doing there upmost to keep the West out of its region. Either for money or patriotism they are against the West. The Times Square attack could have been devastasting, it might have been a crude bomb but there were a tank of gas, and if blown at the right time could have been terrible and the first terror attack in the US
since Sept. 11th. Atleast the one's they tell you about. That oil spill or terror attack will coast over 2 billion.

All the Best,
Toast

To Barak: The oil industry or the fish industry and the health of Americans you decide

To Barak the oil industry or the fish industry and the health of Americans you decide.

Wow what do we have here. A decision from the President of the United States on whether to 

over turn a bill allowing more oil drilling off the coast of my Country. First let me begin by stating

that when Exxon valdez came ashore and all the oil spilled and they Exxon was hit with a billion 

dollar lawsuit. Exxon never did pay that balance. So we have a major oil spill in the Gulf Coast.

Now for arguments sake lets say that the oil spill was not a terrorist act. Which means we don't need

to fortify all oil installations off the coast shores of our precious coast. With drones and coast guard ships

in the event of another "terror attack". Lets say that the oil rig just blew up from a freak accident. Great.

Now we have no fishing industry and the health of those people along the water is now in jeopardy. 

I think Rossevelt said it best when he decided to take over with an executive decision. I want that, and that

and it is now a monument. It is now a treasure of the United States of America. Do you want to touch that.

All the Best,

Kevin M. Tarr

To Nytimes......editorial May 3rd 2010.

Thailand a people's fight by SJOK

Let me first say that in the long run the people will win. You can not stop a revolution.
That said. The country and more important the government of Thailand my old friend
Siam has falsely gained power a few years ago in a coup. This government through out
the Prime Minister on a bogas charge of fraud and corruption.

It would seem to me over this 4 months that the people have spoken. Granted this
government in Thailand will not stand for this an act like China would under these
cirumstances and moe over the people in brutal force. That might happen. Even if
it does now here's the key....it won't stop the people.

All the Best,
Sir Jeremiah O. Kennedy

When we stop fighting for each other then we lose humanity by Sir Jeremiah Kennedy

I felt this quote is appropiate at this time May 2010.
SJOK

Oil spill in Gulf Coast larger the Exxon in Alaska by Sir Jeremiah

Remind me again who the fuck appoved not a few months ago to allow drilling of oil off the
coast of my country. Yes not 2 months ago the congress appoved the oil companies to drill
off the coast of both sides of the United States of America. President Roosevelt would be
discustard as I am.

Most likely this was a terror attack. Which the United States will cover up. To show we don't
get attacked my little terrorists. Or maybe it was an amazing accident. The point is the Gulf
Coast is now ruined. Financially ruined. The fish and shells that was once food is now not.
No Oysters, No shrimp, No catfish, Nothing........

I would have never approved the new drilling rule. From this mistake or terror attack we need
to overturn this new drilling policy.

All the Best
SJOK

the following was in the news today....
oil spill that threatened to eclipse even the infamous Exxon Valdez disaster spread out of control with a faint sheen washing ashore along the Gulf Coast Thursday night as fishermen rushed to scoop up shrimp and crews spread floating barriers around marshes.

The spill was bigger than imagined — five times more than first estimated — and closer. Faint fingers of oily sheen were reaching the Mississippi River delta, lapping the Louisiana shoreline in long, thin lines.

"It is of grave concern," David Kennedy of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, told The Associated Press. "I am frightened. This is a very, very big thing. And the efforts that are going to be required to do anything about it, especially if it continues on, are just mind-boggling." 

My Life story in a nut shell by Sir Jeremiah Orion Kennedy.

I was born in Dallas, Texas and at 3 days old I was adopted by government agents that where basically paid to raise me. When I turned 32 working at HBO in New York I find out while being tortured that my biological parents are known other the Marilyn Monroe and John Kennedy. Either they were never killed or I was the first test tube baby. Since I am sure the government collected all the importants people sperms and egg.

Its 2010 and now living in Fort Lauderdale east. After being told to leave NY and prepare for a war. During this time my adopted family find it best if I receive Social Security disablity, since I can not find work in Boca Raton, even though I just left working for the Chairman of the Board of HBO and President of Time Warner Broadcasting. In 2003 I was admitted after my adopted father flies down from NY to admit me few weeks later I went in. Since then I have been tortured. And I am basically being paid to be tortured.

The defence Department has been using me since 1995 as a human ginea pig for torture. Granted I do have it well I dont have to go into an office, and i live near the beach. Still I am being tortured in the most horrible ways.
The US law states that you have to sue within 2 years of that torture. And not only that but in the National Security assesment or something. It allows for the US goverment to use humans for medial experiments.

So know one does anything about it. The reason I am writing this today is for the Grand children. When I am
died by suicide you will always no that they did nothing about and still lie to me to this day. Telling me I need to be on meds. When the New York Times can write an arctile in 2008 about "Mind Control" and the CIA.
Yet no one can help.

O and I'm also Bionic. an actual super hero.

T.

Peace in the middle east or a new war brewing by SJOK

Today April 25th the USA has sent George Mitchell Obama's point man on Israel to Israel yet once again.
For the past year we have scene Barak try his best to start and bring back the peace process in the failing
Israeli Palestinian conflict. Even Vice -President Biden went to Israel. I am not going to comment on the process or what the outcome might be since I hoping for the best during these meetings.

I will tell you this the whole Middle East Peace process. You have to look at the Countries involved. You have to look at the double headed snake in the room. Syria and Iran. If you cut off the heads you will find that peace will be an objective. If you do not it will be hard to see. Forget about religion is the Countries governments that are fucking you.

All the Best,
SJOK

Here are some thoughts from an Israeli officer......

Israel must prepare the international diplomatic community for a war of this kind and will have to make it clear from the beginning that we have no alternative. Israel will be tasked with explaining that, because the enemy is protecting terrorists during a time of war, we have no choice but to hit the enemy's home front and infrastructure. The very fact of an international debate on this issue is liable to deter the Syrians on the one hand, though it might also put Israel under international diplomatic pressure to restrain itself on the other - but that is a risk worth taking.

Above all, Israel must make it clear right now that, in the event of a missile attack from the north, it will act on the goal of immediately deposing the Alawite regime in Syria even before turning its attention to the missile threat. Such a statement could deter the Syrians from arming Hezbollah with Scuds, out of concern that the Muslim organization might fire the missiles without first coordinating with Syria.

The writer is a reserve brigadier general and former head of the IDF artillery corps

Iran steps to the front of the Media...by Sir Jeremiah Kennedy

If you read my blog sorry about the tormenting life. For the past 8 years my goal has been to 
denuclearization of North Korea and Iran, I have basically attended each meeting with the higher ups. aka envoys. This story pretty much sums up were we are today regarding Iran and its quest for the bomb. 


the following is an article written by Gary thomas of Voice of America............


The dispute between the West and Iran over Tehran's nuclear ambitions has now dragged on for nearly eight years.  Even as Iran holds new military exercises in the Persian Gulf, the United States continues to push for new sanctions on Iran in the U.N. Security Council.  There is no resolution in sight as the U.S. wrestles with how, or even if, Iran can be deterred from going down the nuclear path.  

At a recent congressional hearing, Deputy Undersecretary of Defense for Policy Michelle Flournoy said the Obama administration is ruling nothing out, including possible military action, in its bid to deter Iran from becoming a nuclear-armed state.

"As the president said, all options are on the table," said Michelle Flournoy. "We see it as the Department of Defense's responsibility to plan for all contingencies and provide the president with a wide range of military options should they become necessary.  But as both the secretary - [Defense] Secretary Gates - and [Joint Chiefs of Staff] Chairman [Mike] Mullen have stated, military options are not preferable. And we continue to believe that the most effective approach at this point in time is a combination of diplomacy and pressure in terms of how best to change Iranian behavior."

But analysts say that changing Iranian behavior is easier said than done, and that there may be nothing the U.S. and its allies can do if Iran is determined to become a nuclear power.  

Iran denies harboring any nuclear arms ambitions.  But on-again, off-again negotiations between Tehran and Western powers have yielded little, and Iran's positions shift frequently, often depending on who is voicing them.

Mark Fitzpatrick, director of the Non-Proliferation and Disarmament Program at London's International Institute for Strategic Studies, says the U.S. and Iran are headed toward the kind of impasse that characterized the relationship between the United States and the Soviet Union.

"I think we are in for a long Cold War with Iran in which it will continue to make some progress," said Mark Fitzpatrick. "It will continue to face technical difficulties in its program.  It won't actually cross the line to producing a nuclear weapon because it will face debilitating military action if it does.  And sanctions will be applied that will hamper the Iranian economy but won't necessarily bring it to its knees."

Echoing some other analysts, Fitzpatrick says the West may have to accept an Iran that is nuclear-capable but not nuclear-armed - that is, it can build atomic bombs but halts just short of actually producing them.

"We may have to live with a nuclear-capable Iran," he said. "I think Iran can be deterred from crossing the line from capability to production.  And I think they know that if they cross the line, if they start producing nuclear weapons, if they were to test any or expel inspectors or in any other way signal that they were going for the bomb, then I think they know that they are very likely going to face a military attack."

Tate Nurkin, a security and military intelligence analyst at IHS Jane's Publications, says military action would not halt the Iranian program anyway, and that it would probably spark a wider conflict.

"You can delay it [the program] for several months," said Tate Nurkin. "But I think the problem with that is that it sets off an almost certain conflict in the region, the results of which are highly unpredictable. And the likelihood of that sort of conflict intensifying and for really fundamental miscalculation that would lead from a regional conflict to something that could get larger is pretty high."

There may also be attempts to internally sabotage the Iranian program, but such covert action is never discussed publicly by officials.

Israel remains extremely nervous about Iran, especially about President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad's repeated comments about wiping Israel off the map and his denial of the Holocaust. If there were to be an attack on Iranian nuclear sites, it might well be Israel that launches them, although the distances involved and unfriendly airspace present tactical difficulties for such a move.

Sanctions, says Mark Fitzpatrick, are not likely to sway Iran from the nuclear path.  But, he adds, they do serve several auxiliary purposes.

Among them, sanctions show that Iran's taking a hard line is not without at least some cost, showing, in effect, as he puts it, that crime doesn't pay. 

They can also limit Iran's strategic programs by cutting off access to equipment they need, forcing them to manufacture components themselves that may not be of as high a quality as the imports.  For example, it is making parts for centrifuges for uranium enrichment, and those centrifuges are reporting to be breaking down at a higher than normal rate. And sanctions, he says, also have the side effect of showing the viability of the U.N. Security Council. 

The Washington conference on Nuclear Stability by Sir Jeremiah

Boy O' Boy this just getting better. Now after the Quartet and the Perm 5 members of the security council discuss Iran sanctions. Now we have a conference. Anyway I will not be attending. The topic of discussion is containing and distruputing nuclear power without one actually going off. That would be Bad.

I am glad to hear China is finally coming around with concerns to Iran.....as noted in article......


Chinese Foreign Ministry spokesman Qin Gang said Thursday in Beijing that Hu would stop in Washington on his way to visit Brazil.
"The nuclear security summit will mainly discuss the threat posed by nuclear terrorism," Qin said. He was cautious when pressed on Beijing's Iran policy, saying only that "China will continue to endeavor toward a peaceful resolution."
Yin Gang, a Middle East expert at the Chinese Academy of Social Sciences, said Chinese officials were expected to press Iran's visiting envoy on its nuclear ambitions.
"If Iran continues with its nuclear program in this manner, they should not expect China to acquiesce," Yin said.


Any way 
Ta ta


Happy Easter


ill be at the Ritz Carlton, Fort Laud

My day of pain

WASHINGTON – Six major world powers have agreed to begin putting together proposed new sanctions on Iran over its suspect nuclear program after China dropped its opposition, U.S. officials said Wednesday.

China, long a holdout against fresh international penalties against Iran, signaled its willingness Wednesday to consider a U.N. Security Council sanctions resolution, two U.S. government officials said.

That would appear to improve prospects for passing a resolution aimed at increasing economic and diplomatic pressure on Iran to scale back its nuclear ambitions, which Tehran insists are limited to developingnuclear power for peaceful purposes.

In another sign of movement on the Chinese front, Iran's state media reported Wednesday that the country's top nuclear negotiator will travel to Beijing to discuss possible U.N. sanctions. Iranian state television said Saeed Jalili will hold talks Thursday with senior Chinese officials "concerning the nuclear program."

President Barack Obama had said Tuesday he hoped to have Iran sanctions in place within weeks — a timetable that appeared highly ambitious given China's reluctance to even discuss specific sanctions.