Friday, October 30, 2009

Iran's response to the United Nations IAEA by Sir Jeremiah O. Kennedy


Oct. 30Th 2009 - Iran's response yesterday to the IAEA in Vienna. 

United Nations Mohammad ElBaradei says what they got back from Iran was an "Initial response". Iran would like to send small transports over a longer period of time - suggesting out right that Iran wants this time, and by the way endless time to develop, design a nuclear bomb.By continuing to allow Iran the right to enrich (which by the way goes against three United Nations Security Council Resolutions, drawn up over a period of five years) uranium then as they develop the science to form a missile and design an explosion device still allowing the country to keep there plant open enriching  Iran's own uranium. We the International community are giving permission to Iran tto do this. 

                Aside form the technical aspect of percentage of nuclear material and what country should be entrusted with it. The deal was intended to build confidence and trust between Iran and the West. Over the past five years or more Iran has non-negotiated with the International Community through the United Nations IAEA and the United Nations Security Council. It was just two summers ago during the Bush W. administration that Iran's answer to the Security Council was a document intended to be a conditions on further negotiations. In any event the document was a embarrassment to the diplomatic community. What do I know I was suppose to be an architect. In any event. This is who you are negotiating with is. 

My point It does not seem to me that Iran understands the importance of the Security Council. Why the Security Council was formed and who are on the SC in the UN.  Since they are not negotiating at all and only buying time to say "All done, we did it, we know have a nuclear bomb after all the President is saying well if Israel can have one why can't I. And by the way the leader is Ahmadinejad and you might want to put that in to factor when you are analysing the whole concept of allowing Iran the right to enrich uranium for peaceful energy purposes or the one that levels Manhattan in 3 seconds. 

Today a Senior European official call Iran's response "basically a refusal". Ladies and gentlemen do we really want a terrorist country like Iran to have one. Just picture the destruction of Hiroshima in Tokyo in 1945 then multiply it by a hundred. That's what you got. 

L.O.V.E.

Let Our Violence End

S.J.O.K.